The purpose of research thesis is to know what became the basis of considerations of judge's in bringing condemnation monry laundrying and to know the obstacles faced by the judge indropping criminal prosecution in money laundrying.
From the results of the research conducted at the Semarang District Court, then the data obtained were analyzed by juridical-empirical to obtain or gain an understanding of the basic consideration of judges and judge's constraints in dropping criminal punishment of Money Laundrying Crime.
From the results of the basic research of judges in dropping the criminal money laundering crime, first, the belief is supported by the facts in court it is sufficient for the judge to prove, secondly, the existence of the Criminal Act, namely the new Money laundering, third, in the evidentiary system trial in Money Laundering, the offender must prove the acquired property, fourth, must prove the basis of ownership of money. The obstacles faced by judges are, if in accordance with the Act and as long as the evidence is sufficient to be submitted to the prosecutor, then there is no obstacle. If the witness is unwilling or unable to attend the hearing as long as the prosecutor and the defendant and the legal advisor do not object then there is no problem, but if the witness has to be present to be confronted then the judge has the right to force and be forcibly taken.

Keywords: Juridical Review, Considerations, Crime, Money Laundering